I. CALL TO ORDER:
1.
Roll
Call.
II. TIME CERTAIN:
2.
Time
Open for Public Comment on Any Subject Not on the Agenda.
NOTE: The law does not permit Board action on, or
extended discussion of, any item not on the agenda except under special
circumstances. Comments should be
limited to three minutes. If Board
action is requested, the matter can be placed on the next agenda.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR:
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
Items listed in this section of the
agenda are considered to be routine by the Board and typically will be adopted
by one motion without discussion. The consent calendar includes
action items which the Board has delegated to the CEO, but which law or
contract requires to be decided by the Board (EL-9.9), and CEO monitoring
reports that do not reflect policy violations or call for debate of policy
criteria (GP 4.4). Any item may be severed for separate
consideration at the request of the Board. Whenever a resolution is on
the consent calendar, a roll call vote will be taken on the entire calendar.
IV. GOVERNANCE PROCESS:
Items listed in this section are
considered by the Board to be a part of the Board’s process of governing and
the manner in which it operates.
4.
Approval
of Minutes: May 2, 2006 Special Meeting
and May 9, 2006 Regular Meeting.
(GP-2.4)
6.
2006
Board Planning Calendar. (GP-4)
V. BOARD - CEO LINKAGE:
Items listed in this section are
considered by the Board to be related to delegation of authority to the CEO and
the way in which proper use of delegated authority is ascertained.
8.
Consideration
of New Executive Limitation Regarding Consultant Selection. (Frank Maitski) (BL-4)
VI. ENDS:
Items listed in this
section are considered by the Board to be direction to the CEO and are results
to be achieved by the organization.
None.
VII. EXECUTIVE LIMITATIONS:
Items listed in this section are
considered by the Board to not be delegated to the CEO and require Board
consideration and/or action.
i.
Budget
Adjustment.
12.
Chief
Executive Officer's Report and Bulletins.
(EL-9.12)
a.
Board
Member Requests Responded to in CEO Bulletins for the Weeks of May 5-11 and
i.
Response
to BMR No. R-06-0068, Staff to Investigate Options for Recapturing $80,000
Increased Cost That Resulted From Delaying Project, by Negotiating Additional
Cost Share With City of San Jose. (Katherine Oven) (Responded to in CEO
Bulletin for Week of
ii.
Response
to BMR No. R-06-0061, District and City Staff are to Work Together on Union
Pacific Railroad Issues, Including Lobbying Support in
iii.
Response
to BMR No. R-06-0064, Director Kamei Requested That Staff Clarify With
Landscape Advisory Committee, Guadalupe River Park and Gardens, and City of San
Jose, That Approval of Phase I of Water Conservation Demonstration Garden Does
Not Commit District to Approving Phase II.
(Keith Whitman) (Responded to in CEO Bulletin for Week of
iv.
Response
to BMR No. R-06-0057, Task Force Staff to Involve Councilmembers Forrest and
Pyle as Well as Director Kamei in a Study Comparison for Coyote Trail to
Almaden. (Melanie Richardson) (Responded
to in CEO Bulletin for Week of
v.
Response
to BMR No. R-06-0048, Director Kamei Requested That Communities Such as
vi.
Response
to BMR No. R-06-0066, Staff to Investigate Board Policies and Agricultural
Water Advisory Committee Resolution and Charter to Identify and Revise
Stipulations That Restrict Board From Appointing Members to Represent a
Jurisdiction That They do not Reside in.
(Chris Elias) (Responded to in CEO Bulletin for Week of
vii.
Response
to BMR No. R-06-0058, Staff to Agendize at Next Joint Meeting a Discussion of
Water Supply Issues Associated With
viii.
Response
to BMR No. R-06-0059, Staff to Agendize at Next Joint Meeting of City and
District a Discussion of Water Rates and Bond Financing for Infrastructure
Development. (Melanie Richardson)
(Responded to in CEO Bulletin for Week of
ix.
Response
to BMR No. R-06-0063, Staff to Investigate What District Policies Govern
District Cost-Share Amounts for Bridge Replacements, How Long Those Policies
Have Been in Existence, and Whether or Not They Should be Revised. (Katherine Oven) (Responded to in CEO Bulletin
for Week of
x.
Response
to BMR No. R-06-0077, Staff to Adjust Schedule for Adoption of Fiscal Year
2007-2008 Water Rates So That Final Adoption by Board Occurs On or Before May
15, 2007. (Walt Wadlow) (Responded to in CEO Bulletin for Week of
xi.
Response
to BMR No. R-06-0065, Staff to Provide Recommendations and Proposal on Which,
if any, of 15 Surplus Properties Identified in Response to Board Member Request
No. R-06-0032 Can Be Liquidated. (Frank
Maitski) (Responded to in CEO Bulletin for Week of
xii.
Response
to BMR No. R-06-0089, Staff to Come Back With Cost Per
xiii.
Response
to BMR No. R-06-0074, Staff to Agendize Discussion on Equalizing Agricultural
Rates. (Darin
xiv.
Response
to BMR No. R-06-0076, Staff to Bring information Back Next Year of Shifting $4
Property Tax into Water Rate and Bring an Account of What Maintenance Could be
Done With That (Dependent Upon Not Doing Garden). (Darin
b.
Update
on District Act Revisions.
VIII. CLOSED SESSION:
None.
IX. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS:
X. ADJOURN: