Santa Clara Valley Water District WaterEmergencyNewsFor teachersBusiness & permitsAbout usContact us
Logo
Search

 

Santa Clara Valley Water District
Stream Maintenance Program


Program
Environmental Impact Report



DRAFT MARCH, 2001


READER’S GUIDE

The Stream Maintenance Program and the Environmental Impact Report

The Santa Clara Valley Water District ("District" or "SCVWD") is preparing to implement a Stream Maintenance Program (SMP). The SMP would establish procedures for routine maintenance of stream channels and canals involving ongoing sediment removal, vegetation management, bank protection, and associated minor activities. The SMP incorporates a wetland and riparian mitigation program, a series of resource protection policies, and Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce environmental effects.

This document contains a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared by the District according to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As the lead agency, the District must evaluate the potential environmental effects of its proposed SMP. Because the SMP is a program that the District may adopt, the EIR is termed a "Program EIR". A Program EIR examines the overall environmental effect of the proposed program and establishes the sufficiency of mitigation. The EIR references figures and appendices which are shared with the SMP.

This document contains the Draft Stream Maintenance Program prepared by District staff in conjunction with an external stakeholder committee consisting of regulatory agencies, cities in the District, environmental and business groups. The SMP document contains a main narrative text section, a set of figures bound together, and series of appendices.

The Draft EIR is the beginning of public evaluation. Public agencies, as well as the general public, are invited to review the EIR and to submit comments in writing to:

Santa Clara Valley Water District
Project Management Unit
5750 Almaden Expressway
San Jose, CA 95118-3686

Attention: Cindy Roessler, Project Manager

Or by email to: cindroes@scvwd.dst.ca.us

Because the EIR is the informational basis for District decision-making, comments on the Draft EIR should be directed at any deficiencies and, where possible, should supply information the District can use in preparing a complete environmental record. Public comments, responses to comments, and other additional material will be used along with the Draft EIR to assemble the Final EIR. The Final EIR will be used by the District in determining what action to take.

The main narrative text of the Draft EIR, the SMP, and the shared Figures and Appendices together address the statutory requirements of CEQA.

The main EIR text is organized as follows:

Summary gives a brief overview of the routine maintenance program, impacts and mitigation.

  1. Introduction identifies the processes the District has undertaken in preparation for this EIR, describes the parallel permitting processes, and lists the other responsible agencies which may rely on this EIR in permitting District activities. The introduction also defines the scope of the Program EIR, and the public scoping process.

  2. Project Description describes the routine sediment removal, vegetation management, bank protection, and other facility maintenance projected to be done and summarizes the BMPs the District will apply to individual maintenance projects to minimize potential environmental impact, and compensatory mitigation incorporated into the project.

  3. Plans, Ordinances, and Policies defines District jurisdiction as an independent public agency. Discusses the regulatory requirements of federal and state agencies that may apply to District maintenance. Reviews the relevant General Plans’ policies of the County of Santa Clara and the 15 cities with creeks subject to the District’s jurisdiction.

  4. Environmental Assessment presents the environmental setting, the standards of significance by which the level of impact is determined, and the environmental effects that would result from routine maintenance activities. Potentially significant areas of impact are discussed in four sections:
    1. Geomorphology identifies the natural forces shaping the District’s creeks and the origin of the maintenance problems;
    2. Biological Resources examines impacts on wetlands, riparian communities, and special status species;
    3. Land Use and Community Values considers a range of factors such as noise, dust, traffic, and public services which cumulatively affect land uses surrounding District creeks;
    4. Hazards, Public Health and Safety addresses the potential for maintenance creating hazardous and toxic effects, affecting water quality of the creeks and of receiving waters and public safety; and
    5. Cultural Resources addresses the potential for and measures to be taken if maintenance uncovers historical or prehistorical cultural resources.

  5. Alternatives to the Proposed Project presents the effect of the District not undertaking the maintenance program (No Project) and continuing to rely on case-by-case mitigation for the effects of maintenance. Other program alternatives evaluate the effect of a reduced level of service and different levels of herbicide use.

  6. CEQA Questions answers a series of general questions addressing the potential for growth inducement, significant impacts which cannot be avoided through mitigation, and effects found not to be significant in the Initial Study and Notice of Preparation and hence not addressed in detail in the EIR, and a discussion of cumulative impact.

  7. References contains a glossary of technical terms and abbreviations used in this EIR, cites documents incorporated into the EIR record by reference, lists a general technical bibliography, and identifies the persons preparing the EIR.

Note that all figures are bound together at the end of the EIR.

All Appendices are located in the SMP.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY
A. THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT S-1
B. PROPOSED PROJECT: THE STREAM MAINTENANCE PROGRAM S-1
1. The Scope of the SMP S-1
2. Sediment Removal S-1
3. Vegetation Management S-1
4. Bank Protection S-2
5. Minor Activities S-2
6. Mitigation Incorporated in the Project S-3
7. SMP Exclusions S-3
C. REGULATORY SETTING S-4
1. CEQA S-4
2. Permits from Other Agencies S-4
D. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS S-5
E. CUMULATIVE EFFECTS S-6
F. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT S-6
1. Alternatives Evaluated in EIR S-6
1. Multi-Year Program Alternative S-6
2. Existing Program Alternative [No Project] S-7
3. No Work Alternative S-7
4. No Herbicides Alternative S-7
5. Modified Pajaro River Basin Alternative S-7
6. Reduced Work Alternative S-7
2. Environmental Comparison of Alternatives S-7
3. Alternative to Maintenance is Beyond Scope of SMP S-8
 
I. INTRODUCTION I-1
A. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AS LEAD AGENCY I-1
1. Why the District is preparing a Program EIR I-1
2. Definition of Program EIR I-2
B. THE USES OF THIS EIR I-3
C. PARALLEL STREAM MAINTENANCE PERMITTING I-5
D. SCOPING I-5
 
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION II-1
A. PROJECT LOCATION: THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT II-1
B. PROPOSED PROJECT II-3
1. Project Purpose II-4
2. Contents of the SMP II-4
3. Relationship of SMP Document to the EIR II-5
4. Relationship of SMP to the Parallel Permitting II-5
5. SMP Elements II-6
C. STREAM MAINTENANCE II-6
1. Purpose II-6
2. Sediment Removal II-6
3. Vegetation Management II-8
4. Bank Protection II-18
5. Minor Activities II-21
6. Activities Not Included in SMP II-22
a. Emergency II-22
b. Capital Improvement Projects II-22
c. Non SMP Maintenance Projects II-22
d. Activities Outside of the Scope of Routine Maintenance II-22
D. MITIGATION INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT II-23
1. Policies II-23
2. Best Management Practices II-24
3. Compensatory Mitigation II-24
4. Special Status Species II-28
5. Program Adaptation and Reporting II-28
E. PROGRAM EIR METHODOLOGY II-28
1. Environmental Baseline II-28
2. Work Projections and Planning Horizon II-29
3. Definition of Alternatives II-30
4. Definition of Potential for Cumulative Impact II-31
 
III. PLANS, ORDINANCES AND POLICIES III-1
A. LOCAL III-1
1. Santa Clara Valley Water District III-1
a. District Jurisdiction III-2
1) Ordinance 83-2 III-2
2) Ends Policies III-4
b. Ownership and Easements III-4
c. Restrictions on Actions by Others III-5
d. The Effect of Surrounding Land Use on Routine Maintenance III-6
e. Joint Use Agreements Between the District and other Public Agencies III-7
f. SMP Consistency III-7
B. STATE III-7
1. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) III-7
a. CDFG Laws, Policies and Jurisdiction III-7
b. Existing CDFG MOUs III-8
c. New CDFG MOUs for the SMP III-9
d. SMP Consistency III-9
2. California Regional Water Quality Control Boards
and State Water Resources Control Board
III-10
a. RWQCBs Laws, Policies and Jurisdiction III-10
b. Santa Clara Valley Water District Nonpoint Source Control Program
and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program
III-12
c. Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) III-13
d. Prior RWQCBs Permits III-14
e. New RWQCB Permits for the SMP III-14
f. SMP Consistency III-15
1) Water Quality III-15
2) Wetland Conservation III-16
3. San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission III-16
a. BCDC Laws, Policies and Jurisdiction III-16
b. Existing BCDC Permits III-16
c. SMP Consistency III-16
C. FEDERAL III-17
1. United States Army Corps of Engineers III-17
a. Corps Laws, Policies and Jurisdiction III-17
b. Prior Corps Permits III-18
c. New Corps Permit for the SMP III-18
d. SMP Consistency III-18
2. Endangered Species Act (ESA): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
and National Marine Fisheries Service
III-18
a. Section 6, Recovery Planning III-19
b. Section 7, Consultation III-19
c. Section 9, Prohibition of Take III-19
d. SMP Consistency III-21
D. CITIES AND COUNTY III-21
1. Interlocking Jurisdiction III-21
2. Projected Work in Cities and County III-21
3. General Plan Policies III-23
a. Santa Clara County III-23
1) Policies Directly Relevant to District Maintenance Activities III-23
2) Other policies relevant to waterways III-24
b. City of Campbell III-26
1) Policies particularly relevant to District maintenance activities III-26
2) Other policies relevant to waterways III-27
c. City of Cupertino III-29
1) Policies particularly relevant to District activities III-29
2) Other policies relevant to waterways III-29
d. City of Gilroy III-32
1) Policies particularly relevant to District activities III-32
2) Other policies relevant to waterways III-33
e. City of Los Altos III-37
1) Policies particularly relevant to District activities III-37
2) Other policies relevant to waterways III-38
f. Town of Los Altos Hills III-38
1) Policy particularly relevant to District activities III-38
2) Other policies relevant to waterways III-39
g. Town of Los Gatos III-40
1) Policies particularly relevant to District activities III-40
2) Other Policies Relevant to Waterways III-41
h. City of Milpitas III-42
1) Policies particularly relevant to District activities III-42
2) Other policies relevant to waterways III-43
i. City of Monte Sereno III-44
j. City of Morgan Hill III-45
1) Policies particularly relevant to District activities III-45
2) Other policies relevant to waterways III-46
k. City of Mountain View III-49
1) Policies particularly relevant to District activities III-49
2) Other policies relevant to waterways III-50
l. City of Palo Alto III-51
1) Policies particularly relevant to District activities III-51
2) Other policies relevant to waterways III-53
m. City of San Jose III-54
1) Policies particularly relevant to District activities III-54
2) Other policies relevant to waterways III-56
n. City of Saratoga III-58
1) Policies particularly relevant to District activities III-58
2) Other policies relevant to waterways III-58
o. City of Santa Clara III-61
1) Policies particularly relevant to District activities III-61
2) Other policies relevant to waterways III-62
p. City of Sunnyvale III-63
1) Policies directly relevant to District activities III-63
2) Other policies relevant to waterways III-64
E. SPECIAL PURPOSE LOCAL AGENCIES III-65
1. Guadalupe Resource Conservation District III-65
2. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District III-66
3. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority III-66
 
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IV-A-1
A. GEOMORPHOLOGY IV-A-1
1. Introduction IV-A-1
a. Fluvial System Zones IV-A-2
b. Channel Dynamic Equilibrium IV-A-3
c. Geomorphology and the Stream Maintenance Program IV-A-3
2. Setting IV-A-4
a. Physiographic Setting IV-A-4
1) Santa Cruz Mountains Uplands IV-A-4
2) Diablo Range Uplands IV-A-5
3) Foothills IV-A-6
4) Bay Plains and Alluvial Valleys IV-A-6
b. Geomorphic and Hydrologic Setting IV-A-7
c. Regional Factors Affecting Channel Conditions IV-A-10
1) Faulting IV-A-10
2) Tectonic Movements IV-A-10
3) Changes in Sea level IV-A-11
4) Land Subsidence due to Groundwater Withdrawal IV-A-11
5) Erosion and Landsliding IV-A-11
6) Human Activity IV-A-11
7) Changes in Watershed Cover and Drainage Network IV-A-12
8) Channelization IV-A-12
9) Effect of Hydraulic Structures IV-A-13
d. Maintenance Issues in District Channels IV-A-13
1) Sedimentation IV-A-13
2) Stream Deposited Sediment IV-A-13
3) Bay Muds IV-A-14
e. Classification of Sedimentation Problems IV-A-14
Type 1: Alluvial Channels at Slope Transition in Non-tidal Setting IV-A-16
Type 2: Delta Channels at Slope Transition in Tidal Setting IV-A-16
Type 3: Tidal Channels IV-A-17
Type 4: Channelized Streams IV-A-17
Type 5: Streams Influenced by In-channel Hydraulic Structures IV-A-18
f. Riparian Vegetation Management IV-A-19
g. Streambank Erosion and Stability Management IV-A-20
3. Significance Criteria IV-A-21
4. Impacts and Mitigation IV-A-22
a. Sediment Removal IV-A-23
b. Vegetation Management IV-A-24
c. Bank Protection IV-A-25
d. Minor Maintenance IV-A-27
e. Cumulative Effects IV-A-27
B. BIOLOGY IV-B-1
1. Environmental Setting IV-B-1
a. Description of Habitats in the Project Area IV-B-1
1) Tidal salt marsh IV-B-1
2) Tidal brackish marsh IV-B-3
3) Freshwater wetland IV-B-3
4) Riparian Forest and Woodland IV-B-7
5) Ruderal/Non-native grasslands IV-B-16
6) Open water IV-B-17
b. Fisheries and the Aquatic Environment IV-B-17
1) Existing Fish Habitat and Fisheries IV-B-17
2) Aquatic Microorganisms and Invertebrates IV-B-24
3) The Effects of Watershed Development on Fish Habitat IV-B-25
4) Fish Utilization of Reservoirs and Percolation Ponds IV-B-27
c. Special-status Species IV-B-27
1) Regulatory Background IV-B-28
2) Surveys and Monitoring Performed by the District IV-B-29
3) Special-status Species Definition IV-B-31
4) Special-status Plants IV-B-31
5) Special-status Wildlife IV-B-39
2. Significance Criteria IV-B-54
a. Sensitive Plant Communities IV-B-54
b. Wildlife IV-B-55
c. Fisheries/Aquatic Habitat IV-B-55
d. Special-Status Species IV-B-56
3. Impacts IV-B-57
a. Overview IV-B-57
b. Determination of In-stream Wetland and Woody Riparian Vegetation Impacts IV-B-59
1) Types of Impact IV-B-59
2) Vegetation Responses to Impacts IV-B-59
3) Quantification of Impacts IV-B-60
4) One-time Accounting Method for Stream Vegetation Impacts IV-B-62
c. Determination of Wildlife and Fisheries Impacts IV-B-63
d. Impacts Determined to be Potentially Significant IV-B-65
1) Impacts to Sensitive Plant Communities IV-B-65
2) Impacts to Wildlife Species IV-B-69
3) Impacts to Fisheries/Aquatic Habitat IV-B-80
4) Impacts to Special-status Species IV-B-82
e. Impacts Determined to be Less than Significant Without BMPs IV-B-111
C. LAND USE AND COMMUNITY VALUES IV-C-1
1. Land Use and Planning IV-C-1
a. Setting IV-C-1
1) Geography of Santa Clara County Streams IV-C-1
2) Maintenance Program and Local Land Use Jurisdictions IV-C-2
3) Land Uses Adjacent to Creeks IV-C-2
b. Significance Criteria IV-C-3
c. Impacts IV-C-3
1) Overview IV-C-4
2) Sediment Removal, Vegetation Management and Bank Protection Activities IV-C-3
2. Aesthetics IV-C-4
a. Existing Conditions IV-C-4
b. Significance Criteria IV-C-5
c. Impacts IV-C-6
1) Overview IV-C-6
2) Sediment Removal IV-C-6
3) Vegetation Management IV-C-8
4) Bank Protection IV-C-8
3. Air Quality IV-C-9
a. Setting IV-C-9
b. Significance Criteria IV-C-10
c. Impacts IV-C-10
1) Overview IV-C-10
2) Criteria Pollutants IV-C-11
3) Sediment Removal IV-C-11
4) Vegetation Management IV-C-12
5) Odor IV-C-14
4. Noise IV-C-15
a. Terminology IV-C-15
b. Noise Policies IV-C-16
c. Setting IV-C-17
d. Significance Criteria IV-C-18
e. Impacts IV-C-18
1) Overview IV-C-19
2) Sediment Removal IV-C-19
3) Vegetation Management IV-C-20
4) Bank Protection IV-C-20
5. Public Services and Utilities IV-C-21
a. Setting IV-C-21
b. Significance Criteria IV-C-22
c. Impacts IV-C-22
D. HAZARDS, PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY IV-D-1
1. Water Quality IV-D-1
a. Setting IV-D-1
1) Beneficial Uses of Water IV-D-1
2) Implications of Elevated Mercury Levels in Guadalupe Watershed IV-D-2
b. Significance Criteria IV-D-3
c. Impacts and Mitigation IV-D-4
1) Overview IV-D-4
2) Increased Turbidity and Resuspension of Heavy Metals IV-D-5
3) Water Supply and Groundwater Resources IV-D-9
2. Fire Safety IV-D-10
a. Setting IV-D-10
1) Regulation IV-D-10
2) Existing Control IV-D-10
b. Significance Criterion IV-D-11
c. Impacts and Mitigation IV-D-11
1) Increased Fire Hazard from Maintenance Vehicles IV-D-11
2) Increased Fire Hazard from Maintenance Operations IV-D-12
3. Flood Protection IV-D-12
a. Setting IV-D-12
1) Flood Control IV-D-12
2) Regulation of Federal Flood Protection Projects IV-D-13
3) District Maintenance Guidelines IV-D-13
4) Significance Criteria IV-D-14
b. Impacts and Mitigation IV-D-14
4. Hazardous Materials IV-D-15
a. Setting IV-D-15
b. Significance Criteria IV-D-15
c. Impacts and Mitigation IV-D-16
5. Toxic Substances IV-D-18
a. Setting IV-D-18
b. Regulatory Setting and Significance Criteria IV-D-19
1) State and Federal Regulation IV-D-19
2) CEQA IV-D-19
c. Impacts and Mitigation IV-D-20
1) Sediment Removal IV-D-20
2) Vegetation Management IV-D-20
E. CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES IV-E-1
1. Environmental Setting IV-E-1
a. Prehistoric Background IV-E-1
b. Ethnographic Background IV-E-4
1) Hispanic Period IV-E-4
2) American Period IV-E-8
2. Significance Criteria IV-E-8
a. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) IV-E-8
1) Historical Resources IV-E-8
2) Archaeological Resources IV-E-9
b. Other California Laws and Regulations IV-E-10
c. Federal Statutes/Regulations IV-E-10
3. Impacts and Mitigation IV-E-11
a. Mitigation: Protocol for Unexpected Discovery of Archaeological Cultural Materials IV-E-11
b. Mitigation: Standard Protocol to Determine Project Potential to Affect Cultural Resources IV-E-11
c. Mitigation: Protocol for Discovery of Native American Burials IV-E-12
d. Native American Burial Plan (NABP) IV-E-13
 
V. ALTERNATIVES V-1
A. SCOPE OF ANALYSIS V-1
1. Requirements of CEQA V-2
2. Maintenance Baseline V-2
3. Effects to be Avoided V-4
B. ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED IN EIR V-5
1. Multi-Year Program (Preferred Alternative) V-7
2. Existing Program Alternative V-8
3. No Work Alternative V-9
4. No Herbicides Alternative V-10
5. Modified Pajaro River Basin Alternative V-11
6. Reduced Work Alternative V-12
C. CONSIDERATIONS OF GEOMORPHOLOGY, ENGINEERING REDESIGN,
AND WATERSHED APPROACH
V-24
1. Role of Fluvial Geomorphology V-24
2. Design Alternatives V-24
3. Watershed Approach V-26
 
VI. CEQA QUESTIONS VI-1
A. GROWTH INDUCING ASPECTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT VI-1
B. SIGNIFICANT, IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES VI-1
C. EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT VI-2
D. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS VI-3
1. Cumulative Impacts of the SMP VI-3
2. Impacts From Proposed Mitigation Projects VI-4
3. Cumulative Impacts of Other Activities Affecting District Channels VI-10
 
VII. REFERENCES VII-1
A. GLOSSARY OF SIGNIFICANT TERMS VII-16
B. PERSONAL COMMUNICATION VII-16
C. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE VII-16
D. GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHY VII-16
E. REPORT PREPARERS VII-26




LIST OF TABLES
 
Table II-1 Flood Control Zones
Table II-2 Existing Channel Conditions
Table II-3 Extent of Projected Sediment
Table II-4 Extent of Projected Vegetation Management
Table II-5 Existing Annual Herbicide Use
Table II-6 Extent of Projected Cumulative Channel Work
Table II-7 Compensatory Stream Vegetation and Special Status Species Mitigation
Table II-8 Bank Protection: In-stream Impact and Mitigation Matrix
Table II-9 Bank Protection: Stream-side Impact and Mitigation Matrix
Table II-10 Other Future District Projects in Creeks
Table III-1 Federal Agencies with Regulatory Oversight
Table III-2 Agency Permit Jurisdiction Over SMP Activities
Table III-3 Creeks and Projected Work in Cities and County
Table III-4 Local General Plan Policies for Streams
Table IV-A-1 Watershed Characteristics of Typical Creeks
Table IV-A-2 Sedimentation Causal Factors
Table IV-A-3 Geomorphic Setting and Causal Factor of Sediment Removal Sites
Table IV-B-1 Estimated Existing Channel Type by Basin
Table IV-B-2 Fish Habitat by Basin
Table IV-B-3 Fish, Amphibian, and Reptile Species Compositions In Fish Communities of Santa Clara Valley
Table IV-B-4 Fish Habitat by Channel Type
Table IV-B-5 Special-status Plant Species Potentially Occurring in the Program Area
Table IV-B-6 Special-status Wildlife Species Potentially Occurring in the Program Area
Table IV-B-7 Summary of in-channel vegetation impacts in acres.
Table IV-B-8 Channel maintenance activities occurring in different fish habitat types In Santa Clara Basin
Table IV-B-9 Special-status Species Herbicide Exposure Categories
Table IV-B-10 Special-status Species Rodenticide Use Limitations
Table IV-B-11-A Special-status Plant Species Evaluated for Inclusion in the EIR
Table IV-B-11-B Special-status Animal Species Evaluated for Inclusion in the EIR
Table IV-C-1 District-wide Maintenance Emissions(Pounds)
Table IV-C-2 Emissions for a Typical Site with Basic Dust Control Measures(Pounds/Day)
Table IV-D-1 Mean Metal Concentration (Mg/kg) and Grain Size Distribution of Sediment Samples from Stream Stations
Table IV-D-2a District Use Herbicide Application Rates
Table IV-D-2b District Use Herbicide Acute Toxicity and Exposure Scenarios
Table IV-E-1 The Chartkoff and Chartkoff (1984) Model of Cultural Periods in California
Table IV-E-2 Comparison of California Cultural Period with Temporal Phases of Central California (Allen et al., 1999)
Table V-1 Definition of Alternatives
Table V-2 Alternatives Comparison of Initial Stream Vegetation Impacts
Table V-3 Comparison of Alternatives by Impacts
 




LINKS TO FIGURES
 
Figure I-1 Resource Protection Protocol
Figure II-1 Streams & Canals in District Jurisdiction
Figure II-2 Projected Sediment Removal Work Areas
Figure II-3 Projected Channel Vegetation Management Work Areas
Figure II-4 Projected Upland Vegetation Management Work Areas
Figure II-5 Projected Combined Channel Work Areas
Figure II-6 Historical Bank Protection Work Areas
Figure II-7 Compensatory Mitigation Sites
Figure IV- B1 Fisheries Map
Figure IV-B2 Red Legged Frog Surveys/locations
Figure IV-B3 Bay Checkerspot Butterfly Locations
Figure IV-B4 Red Legged Frog in Work Areas
Figure IV-B5 Red Legged Frog Locations
Figure IV-B6 Western Pond Turtle Locations
Figure IV-B7 San Francisco Garter Snake
Figure IV-B8 California Clapper Rail Locations
Figure IV-B9 Western Plover Locations
Figure IV-B10 Burrowing Owl Locations
Figure IV-B11 Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse Locations
Figure IV-B12 Serpentine Habitat
Figure IV-B13 Projected Impacts to Stream Vegetation in the Multi-year Stream Maintenance Program
Figure IV-C1 Land Use in Santa Clara County
Figure IV-E1 Summary Archaeological Monitoring Procedure Chart
Figure IV-E2 Unexpected Discoveries
Figure IV-E3 Native American Burials
Figure V-1 Reduced Work Area Alternative


RETURN TO TOP



Providing stream stewardship, wholesale water supply and flood protection for Santa Clara County.