| SUMMARY |
A. THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY
WATER DISTRICT |
S-1 |
B. PROPOSED PROJECT: THE
STREAM MAINTENANCE PROGRAM |
S-1 |
1. The Scope of the SMP |
S-1 |
2. Sediment Removal |
S-1 |
3. Vegetation Management |
S-1 |
4. Bank Protection |
S-2 |
5. Minor Activities |
S-2 |
6. Mitigation Incorporated
in the Project |
S-3 |
7. SMP Exclusions |
S-3 |
C. REGULATORY SETTING |
S-4 |
1. CEQA |
S-4 |
2. Permits from Other Agencies |
S-4 |
D. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS |
S-5 |
E. CUMULATIVE EFFECTS |
S-6 |
F. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED
PROJECT |
S-6 |
1. Alternatives Evaluated
in EIR |
S-6 |
1. Multi-Year Program Alternative |
S-6 |
2. Existing Program Alternative
[No Project] |
S-7 |
3. No Work Alternative |
S-7 |
4. No Herbicides Alternative |
S-7 |
5. Modified Pajaro River
Basin Alternative |
S-7 |
6. Reduced Work Alternative |
S-7 |
2. Environmental Comparison
of Alternatives |
S-7 |
3. Alternative to Maintenance
is Beyond Scope of SMP |
S-8 |
| |
| I. INTRODUCTION |
I-1 |
A. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER
DISTRICT AS LEAD AGENCY |
I-1 |
1. Why the District is preparing
a Program EIR |
I-1 |
2. Definition of Program
EIR |
I-2 |
B. THE USES OF THIS EIR
|
I-3 |
C. PARALLEL STREAM MAINTENANCE
PERMITTING |
I-5 |
D. SCOPING |
I-5 |
| |
| II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION |
II-1 |
A. PROJECT LOCATION: THE
SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT |
II-1 |
B. PROPOSED PROJECT |
II-3 |
1. Project Purpose |
II-4 |
2. Contents of the SMP |
II-4 |
3. Relationship of SMP Document
to the EIR |
II-5 |
4. Relationship of SMP to
the Parallel Permitting |
II-5 |
5. SMP Elements |
II-6 |
C. STREAM MAINTENANCE |
II-6 |
1. Purpose |
II-6 |
2. Sediment Removal |
II-6 |
3. Vegetation Management
|
II-8 |
4. Bank Protection |
II-18 |
5. Minor Activities |
II-21 |
6. Activities Not Included
in SMP |
II-22 |
a. Emergency |
II-22 |
b. Capital Improvement Projects
|
II-22 |
c. Non SMP Maintenance Projects |
II-22 |
d. Activities Outside of
the Scope of Routine Maintenance |
II-22 |
D. MITIGATION INCORPORATED
INTO THE PROJECT |
II-23 |
1. Policies |
II-23 |
2. Best Management Practices |
II-24 |
3. Compensatory Mitigation
|
II-24 |
4. Special Status Species |
II-28 |
5. Program Adaptation and
Reporting |
II-28 |
E. PROGRAM EIR METHODOLOGY |
II-28 |
1. Environmental Baseline |
II-28 |
2. Work Projections and
Planning Horizon |
II-29 |
3. Definition of Alternatives |
II-30 |
4. Definition of Potential
for Cumulative Impact |
II-31 |
| |
| III. PLANS, ORDINANCES AND POLICIES
|
III-1 |
A. LOCAL |
III-1 |
1. Santa Clara Valley Water
District |
III-1 |
a. District Jurisdiction |
III-2 |
1) Ordinance 83-2 |
III-2 |
2) Ends Policies |
III-4 |
b. Ownership and Easements |
III-4 |
c. Restrictions on Actions
by Others |
III-5 |
d. The Effect of Surrounding
Land Use on Routine Maintenance |
III-6 |
e. Joint Use Agreements
Between the District and other Public Agencies |
III-7 |
f. SMP Consistency |
III-7 |
B. STATE |
III-7 |
1. California Department
of Fish and Game (CDFG) |
III-7 |
a. CDFG Laws, Policies and
Jurisdiction |
III-7 |
b. Existing CDFG MOUs |
III-8 |
c. New CDFG MOUs for the
SMP |
III-9 |
d. SMP Consistency |
III-9 |
2. California Regional Water
Quality Control Boards
and State Water Resources
Control Board |
III-10 |
a. RWQCBs Laws, Policies
and Jurisdiction |
III-10 |
b. Santa Clara Valley Water
District Nonpoint Source Control Program
and Total Maximum Daily Load
(TMDL) Program |
III-12 |
c. Total Maximum Daily Loads
(TMDL) |
III-13 |
d. Prior RWQCBs Permits
|
III-14 |
e. New RWQCB Permits for
the SMP |
III-14 |
f. SMP Consistency |
III-15 |
1) Water Quality |
III-15 |
2) Wetland Conservation |
III-16 |
3. San Francisco Bay Conservation
and Development Commission |
III-16 |
a. BCDC Laws, Policies and
Jurisdiction |
III-16 |
b. Existing BCDC Permits |
III-16 |
c. SMP Consistency |
III-16 |
C. FEDERAL |
III-17 |
1. United States Army Corps
of Engineers |
III-17 |
a. Corps Laws, Policies
and Jurisdiction |
III-17 |
b. Prior Corps Permits |
III-18 |
c. New Corps Permit for
the SMP |
III-18 |
d. SMP Consistency |
III-18 |
2. Endangered Species Act
(ESA): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
and National Marine Fisheries
Service |
III-18 |
a. Section 6, Recovery Planning |
III-19 |
b. Section 7, Consultation
|
III-19 |
c. Section 9, Prohibition
of Take |
III-19 |
d. SMP Consistency |
III-21 |
D.
CITIES AND COUNTY |
III-21 |
1. Interlocking Jurisdiction
|
III-21 |
2. Projected Work in Cities
and County |
III-21 |
3. General Plan Policies
|
III-23 |
a. Santa Clara County |
III-23 |
1) Policies Directly Relevant
to District Maintenance Activities |
III-23 |
2) Other policies relevant
to waterways |
III-24 |
b. City of Campbell |
III-26 |
1) Policies particularly
relevant to District maintenance activities |
III-26 |
2) Other policies relevant
to waterways |
III-27 |
c. City of Cupertino |
III-29 |
1) Policies particularly
relevant to District activities |
III-29 |
2) Other policies relevant
to waterways |
III-29 |
d. City of Gilroy |
III-32 |
1) Policies particularly
relevant to District activities |
III-32 |
2) Other policies relevant
to waterways |
III-33 |
e. City of Los Altos |
III-37 |
1) Policies particularly
relevant to District activities |
III-37 |
2) Other policies relevant
to waterways |
III-38 |
f. Town of Los Altos Hills |
III-38 |
1) Policy particularly relevant
to District activities |
III-38 |
2) Other policies relevant
to waterways |
III-39 |
g. Town of Los Gatos |
III-40 |
1) Policies particularly
relevant to District activities |
III-40
|
2) Other Policies Relevant
to Waterways |
III-41 |
h. City of Milpitas |
III-42 |
1) Policies particularly
relevant to District activities |
III-42 |
2) Other policies relevant
to waterways |
III-43 |
i. City of Monte Sereno
|
III-44 |
j. City of Morgan Hill |
III-45 |
1) Policies particularly
relevant to District activities |
III-45 |
2) Other policies relevant
to waterways |
III-46 |
k. City of Mountain View |
III-49 |
1) Policies particularly
relevant to District activities |
III-49 |
2) Other policies relevant
to waterways |
III-50 |
l. City of Palo Alto |
III-51 |
1) Policies particularly
relevant to District activities |
III-51 |
2) Other policies relevant
to waterways |
III-53 |
m. City of San Jose |
III-54 |
1) Policies particularly
relevant to District activities |
III-54 |
2) Other policies relevant
to waterways |
III-56 |
n. City of Saratoga |
III-58 |
1) Policies particularly
relevant to District activities |
III-58 |
2) Other policies relevant
to waterways |
III-58 |
o. City of Santa Clara |
III-61 |
1) Policies particularly
relevant to District activities |
III-61 |
2) Other policies relevant
to waterways |
III-62 |
p. City of Sunnyvale |
III-63 |
1) Policies directly relevant
to District activities |
III-63 |
2) Other policies relevant
to waterways |
III-64 |
E. SPECIAL PURPOSE LOCAL
AGENCIES |
III-65 |
1. Guadalupe Resource Conservation
District |
III-65 |
2. Midpeninsula Regional
Open Space District |
III-66 |
3. Santa Clara County Open
Space Authority |
III-66 |
| |
| IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT |
IV-A-1 |
A. GEOMORPHOLOGY |
IV-A-1 |
1. Introduction |
IV-A-1 |
a. Fluvial System Zones
|
IV-A-2 |
b. Channel Dynamic Equilibrium |
IV-A-3 |
c. Geomorphology and the
Stream Maintenance Program |
IV-A-3 |
2. Setting |
IV-A-4 |
a. Physiographic Setting |
IV-A-4 |
1) Santa Cruz Mountains
Uplands |
IV-A-4 |
2) Diablo Range Uplands |
IV-A-5 |
3) Foothills |
IV-A-6 |
4) Bay Plains and Alluvial
Valleys |
IV-A-6 |
b. Geomorphic and Hydrologic
Setting |
IV-A-7 |
c. Regional Factors Affecting
Channel Conditions |
IV-A-10 |
1) Faulting |
IV-A-10 |
2) Tectonic Movements |
IV-A-10 |
3) Changes in Sea level |
IV-A-11 |
4) Land Subsidence due to
Groundwater Withdrawal |
IV-A-11 |
5) Erosion and Landsliding
|
IV-A-11 |
6) Human Activity |
IV-A-11 |
7) Changes in Watershed
Cover and Drainage Network |
IV-A-12 |
8) Channelization |
IV-A-12 |
9) Effect of Hydraulic Structures |
IV-A-13 |
d. Maintenance Issues in
District Channels |
IV-A-13 |
1) Sedimentation |
IV-A-13 |
2) Stream Deposited Sediment |
IV-A-13 |
3) Bay Muds |
IV-A-14 |
e. Classification of Sedimentation
Problems |
IV-A-14 |
Type 1: Alluvial Channels
at Slope Transition in Non-tidal Setting |
IV-A-16 |
Type 2: Delta Channels at
Slope Transition in Tidal Setting |
IV-A-16 |
Type 3: Tidal Channels |
IV-A-17 |
Type 4: Channelized Streams |
IV-A-17 |
Type 5: Streams Influenced
by In-channel Hydraulic Structures |
IV-A-18 |
f. Riparian Vegetation Management
|
IV-A-19 |
g. Streambank Erosion and
Stability Management |
IV-A-20 |
3. Significance Criteria
|
IV-A-21 |
4. Impacts and Mitigation |
IV-A-22 |
a. Sediment Removal |
IV-A-23 |
b. Vegetation Management |
IV-A-24 |
c. Bank Protection |
IV-A-25 |
d. Minor Maintenance |
IV-A-27 |
e. Cumulative Effects |
IV-A-27 |
B. BIOLOGY
|
IV-B-1 |
1. Environmental Setting
|
IV-B-1 |
a. Description of Habitats
in the Project Area |
IV-B-1 |
1) Tidal salt marsh |
IV-B-1 |
2) Tidal brackish marsh |
IV-B-3 |
3) Freshwater wetland |
IV-B-3 |
4) Riparian Forest and Woodland |
IV-B-7 |
5) Ruderal/Non-native grasslands
|
IV-B-16 |
6) Open water |
IV-B-17 |
b. Fisheries and the Aquatic
Environment |
IV-B-17 |
1) Existing Fish Habitat
and Fisheries |
IV-B-17 |
2) Aquatic Microorganisms
and Invertebrates |
IV-B-24 |
3) The Effects of Watershed
Development on Fish Habitat |
IV-B-25 |
4) Fish Utilization of Reservoirs
and Percolation Ponds |
IV-B-27 |
c. Special-status Species |
IV-B-27 |
1) Regulatory Background |
IV-B-28 |
2) Surveys and Monitoring
Performed by the District |
IV-B-29 |
3) Special-status Species
Definition |
IV-B-31 |
4) Special-status Plants
|
IV-B-31 |
5) Special-status Wildlife
|
IV-B-39 |
2. Significance
Criteria |
IV-B-54 |
a. Sensitive Plant Communities |
IV-B-54 |
b. Wildlife |
IV-B-55 |
c. Fisheries/Aquatic Habitat
|
IV-B-55 |
d. Special-Status Species
|
IV-B-56 |
3. Impacts |
IV-B-57 |
a. Overview |
IV-B-57 |
b. Determination of In-stream
Wetland and Woody Riparian Vegetation Impacts |
IV-B-59 |
1) Types of Impact |
IV-B-59 |
2) Vegetation Responses
to Impacts |
IV-B-59 |
3) Quantification of Impacts
|
IV-B-60 |
4) One-time Accounting Method
for Stream Vegetation Impacts |
IV-B-62 |
c. Determination of Wildlife
and Fisheries Impacts |
IV-B-63 |
d. Impacts Determined to
be Potentially Significant |
IV-B-65 |
1) Impacts to Sensitive
Plant Communities |
IV-B-65 |
2) Impacts to Wildlife Species
|
IV-B-69 |
3) Impacts to Fisheries/Aquatic
Habitat |
IV-B-80 |
4) Impacts to Special-status
Species |
IV-B-82 |
e. Impacts Determined to
be Less than Significant Without BMPs |
IV-B-111 |
C. LAND
USE AND COMMUNITY VALUES |
IV-C-1 |
1. Land Use and Planning
|
IV-C-1 |
a. Setting |
IV-C-1 |
1) Geography of Santa Clara
County Streams |
IV-C-1 |
2) Maintenance Program and
Local Land Use Jurisdictions |
IV-C-2 |
3) Land Uses Adjacent to
Creeks |
IV-C-2 |
b. Significance Criteria |
IV-C-3 |
c. Impacts |
IV-C-3 |
1) Overview |
IV-C-4 |
2) Sediment Removal, Vegetation
Management and Bank Protection Activities |
IV-C-3 |
2. Aesthetics |
IV-C-4 |
a. Existing Conditions |
IV-C-4 |
b. Significance Criteria |
IV-C-5 |
c. Impacts |
IV-C-6 |
1) Overview |
IV-C-6 |
2) Sediment Removal |
IV-C-6 |
3) Vegetation Management
|
IV-C-8 |
4) Bank Protection |
IV-C-8 |
3. Air Quality |
IV-C-9 |
a. Setting |
IV-C-9 |
b. Significance Criteria |
IV-C-10 |
c. Impacts |
IV-C-10 |
1) Overview |
IV-C-10 |
2) Criteria Pollutants |
IV-C-11 |
3) Sediment Removal |
IV-C-11 |
4) Vegetation Management
|
IV-C-12 |
5) Odor |
IV-C-14 |
4. Noise |
IV-C-15 |
a. Terminology |
IV-C-15 |
b. Noise Policies |
IV-C-16 |
c. Setting |
IV-C-17 |
d. Significance Criteria |
IV-C-18 |
e. Impacts |
IV-C-18 |
1) Overview |
IV-C-19 |
2) Sediment Removal |
IV-C-19 |
3) Vegetation Management
|
IV-C-20 |
4) Bank Protection |
IV-C-20 |
5. Public Services and Utilities
|
IV-C-21 |
a. Setting |
IV-C-21 |
b. Significance Criteria |
IV-C-22 |
c. Impacts |
IV-C-22 |
D. HAZARDS,
PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY |
IV-D-1 |
1. Water Quality |
IV-D-1 |
a. Setting |
IV-D-1 |
1) Beneficial Uses of Water |
IV-D-1 |
2) Implications of Elevated
Mercury Levels in Guadalupe Watershed |
IV-D-2 |
b. Significance Criteria |
IV-D-3 |
c. Impacts and Mitigation
|
IV-D-4 |
1) Overview |
IV-D-4 |
2) Increased Turbidity and
Resuspension of Heavy Metals |
IV-D-5 |
3) Water Supply and Groundwater
Resources |
IV-D-9 |
2. Fire Safety |
IV-D-10 |
a. Setting |
IV-D-10 |
1) Regulation |
IV-D-10 |
2) Existing Control |
IV-D-10 |
b. Significance Criterion
|
IV-D-11 |
c. Impacts and Mitigation
|
IV-D-11 |
1) Increased Fire Hazard
from Maintenance Vehicles |
IV-D-11 |
2) Increased Fire Hazard
from Maintenance Operations |
IV-D-12 |
3. Flood Protection |
IV-D-12 |
a. Setting |
IV-D-12 |
1) Flood Control |
IV-D-12 |
2) Regulation of Federal
Flood Protection Projects |
IV-D-13 |
3) District Maintenance
Guidelines |
IV-D-13 |
4) Significance Criteria
|
IV-D-14 |
b. Impacts and Mitigation
|
IV-D-14 |
4. Hazardous Materials |
IV-D-15 |
a. Setting |
IV-D-15 |
b. Significance Criteria |
IV-D-15 |
c. Impacts and Mitigation |
IV-D-16 |
5. Toxic Substances |
IV-D-18 |
a. Setting |
IV-D-18 |
b. Regulatory Setting and
Significance Criteria |
IV-D-19 |
1) State and Federal Regulation |
IV-D-19 |
2) CEQA |
IV-D-19 |
c. Impacts and Mitigation
|
IV-D-20 |
1) Sediment Removal |
IV-D-20 |
2) Vegetation Management
|
IV-D-20 |
E. CULTURAL
AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES |
IV-E-1 |
1. Environmental Setting
|
IV-E-1 |
a. Prehistoric Background
|
IV-E-1 |
b. Ethnographic Background |
IV-E-4 |
1) Hispanic Period |
IV-E-4 |
2) American Period |
IV-E-8 |
2. Significance Criteria
|
IV-E-8 |
a. California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) |
IV-E-8 |
1) Historical Resources |
IV-E-8 |
2) Archaeological Resources |
IV-E-9 |
b. Other California Laws
and Regulations |
IV-E-10 |
c. Federal Statutes/Regulations |
IV-E-10 |
3. Impacts and Mitigation |
IV-E-11 |
a. Mitigation: Protocol
for Unexpected Discovery of Archaeological Cultural Materials
|
IV-E-11 |
b. Mitigation: Standard
Protocol to Determine Project Potential to Affect Cultural Resources |
IV-E-11 |
c. Mitigation: Protocol
for Discovery of Native American Burials |
IV-E-12 |
d. Native American Burial
Plan (NABP) |
IV-E-13 |
| |
| V. ALTERNATIVES |
V-1 |
A. SCOPE OF ANALYSIS |
V-1 |
1. Requirements of CEQA |
V-2 |
2. Maintenance Baseline |
V-2 |
3. Effects to be Avoided
|
V-4 |
B. ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED
IN EIR |
V-5 |
1. Multi-Year Program (Preferred
Alternative) |
V-7 |
2. Existing Program Alternative
|
V-8 |
3. No Work Alternative |
V-9 |
4. No Herbicides Alternative
|
V-10 |
5. Modified Pajaro River
Basin Alternative |
V-11 |
6. Reduced Work Alternative |
V-12 |
C. CONSIDERATIONS OF GEOMORPHOLOGY,
ENGINEERING REDESIGN,
AND WATERSHED APPROACH |
V-24 |
1. Role of Fluvial Geomorphology
|
V-24 |
2. Design Alternatives |
V-24 |
3. Watershed Approach |
V-26 |
| |
| VI. CEQA QUESTIONS |
VI-1 |
A. GROWTH INDUCING ASPECTS
OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT |
VI-1 |
B. SIGNIFICANT, IRREVERSIBLE
ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES |
VI-1 |
C. EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO
BE SIGNIFICANT |
VI-2 |
D. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS |
VI-3 |
1. Cumulative Impacts of
the SMP |
VI-3 |
2. Impacts From Proposed
Mitigation Projects |
VI-4 |
3. Cumulative Impacts of
Other Activities Affecting District Channels |
VI-10 |
| |
| VII. REFERENCES |
VII-1 |
A. GLOSSARY OF SIGNIFICANT
TERMS |
VII-16 |
B. PERSONAL COMMUNICATION |
VII-16 |
C. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED
BY REFERENCE |
VII-16 |
D. GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHY
|
VII-16 |
E. REPORT PREPARERS |
VII-26 |
|
|
LIST OF TABLES
|
| |
| Table II-1 |
Flood Control Zones |
| Table II-2 |
Existing Channel Conditions |
| Table II-3 |
Extent of Projected Sediment |
| Table II-4 |
Extent of Projected Vegetation Management |
| Table II-5 |
Existing Annual Herbicide Use |
| Table II-6 |
Extent of Projected Cumulative Channel Work |
| Table II-7 |
Compensatory Stream Vegetation and Special Status Species Mitigation |
| Table II-8 |
Bank Protection: In-stream Impact and Mitigation Matrix |
| Table II-9 |
Bank Protection: Stream-side Impact and Mitigation Matrix |
| Table II-10 |
Other Future District Projects in Creeks |
| Table III-1 |
Federal Agencies with Regulatory Oversight |
| Table III-2 |
Agency Permit Jurisdiction Over SMP Activities |
| Table III-3 |
Creeks and Projected Work in Cities and County |
| Table III-4 |
Local General Plan Policies for Streams |
| Table IV-A-1 |
Watershed Characteristics of Typical Creeks |
| Table IV-A-2 |
Sedimentation Causal Factors |
| Table IV-A-3 |
Geomorphic Setting and Causal Factor of Sediment Removal Sites |
| Table IV-B-1 |
Estimated Existing Channel Type by Basin |
| Table IV-B-2 |
Fish Habitat by Basin |
| Table IV-B-3 |
Fish, Amphibian, and Reptile Species Compositions In Fish Communities
of Santa Clara Valley |
| Table IV-B-4 |
Fish Habitat by Channel Type |
| Table IV-B-5 |
Special-status Plant Species Potentially Occurring in the Program
Area |
| Table IV-B-6 |
Special-status Wildlife Species Potentially Occurring in the
Program Area |
| Table IV-B-7 |
Summary of in-channel vegetation impacts in acres. |
| Table IV-B-8 |
Channel maintenance activities occurring in different fish
habitat types In Santa Clara Basin |
| Table IV-B-9 |
Special-status Species Herbicide Exposure Categories |
| Table IV-B-10 |
Special-status Species Rodenticide Use Limitations |
| Table IV-B-11-A |
Special-status Plant Species Evaluated for Inclusion in the
EIR |
| Table IV-B-11-B |
Special-status Animal Species Evaluated for Inclusion in the
EIR |
| Table IV-C-1 |
District-wide Maintenance Emissions(Pounds) |
| Table IV-C-2 |
Emissions for a Typical Site with Basic Dust Control Measures(Pounds/Day) |
| Table IV-D-1 |
Mean Metal Concentration (Mg/kg) and Grain Size Distribution
of Sediment Samples from Stream Stations |
| Table IV-D-2a |
District Use Herbicide Application Rates |
| Table IV-D-2b |
District Use Herbicide Acute Toxicity and Exposure Scenarios |
| Table IV-E-1 |
The Chartkoff and Chartkoff (1984) Model of Cultural Periods
in California |
| Table IV-E-2 |
Comparison of California Cultural Period with Temporal Phases
of Central California (Allen et al., 1999) |
| Table V-1 |
Definition of Alternatives |
| Table V-2 |
Alternatives Comparison of Initial Stream Vegetation Impacts |
| Table V-3 |
Comparison of Alternatives by Impacts |
| |
|
|