This project allows the District to work with local municipalities to clearly identify roles and responsibilities for floodplain management and flood emergency management and increase awareness of the District’s flood response procedures. The project supports countywide emergency response and preparedness activities, develops communication procedures and disseminates web-based flood forecasting information developed under Project C2, Emergency Response Upgrades. Collaborators also develop formal, site-specific flood response procedures or action plans (flood-fighting strategies), and coordinate outreach throughout the county so that the public receives uniform flood warning messages.
This project is comprised of 2 sub-projects that support the District’s ongoing emergency response planning. Refer to Appendix B in the 5-Year Implementation Plan for project descriptions. These sub-projects are:
E2.1 Coordination with Local Municipalities on Flood Communication
E2.2 Flood-Fighting Action Plans
Key Performance Indicators for the Safe, Clean Water Program
KPI #1: Coordinate with agencies to incorporate District-endorsed flood emergency procedures into their Emergency Operations Center plans.
E2.1: Coordination with Local Municipalities on Flood Communication
In October 2018, the District hosted a Winter Emergency Operations and Preparedness Workshop with attendees from various cities and the county. The meeting comprised of presenters from the District's Office of Emergency Services (ESS),and Security Unit (ESS), along with representatives from Watershed Field Operations, Reservoir Operations, Public Information, Hydraulics/, Hydrology & Geomorphology, and Sandbag Programs. Presenters also included staff from the National Weather Service, Cal Fire, Department of Water Resources and the Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Services. The purpose of the meeting was to share information regarding the upcoming rainy season and the multiple agencies' activities that transpire during the winter season. The emphasis was on response, coordination and communication as a way to pro-actively and collaboratively prepare for potential flooding.
The annual coordination meeting with the Santa Clara County, led by the District’s Dam Safety Program and ESS Unit took place at the November 15, 2018 Emergency Managers meeting. The presentation by District staff and the subsequent Q&A touched on the following subjects: notification charts, roles/responsibilities, inundation maps and the B, C and D condition levels for Anderson Dam, as reflected in its Emergency Action Plan.
On December 4, 2018, District ESS presented and participated in the annual San Francisquito Creek Multi-Agency Coordination meeting and table -top exercise at the City of Palo Alto community center. Topics covered in the multiple presentations were: PIO roles, agency coordination, Joint Information Centers, and national weather service.
KPI #2: Complete 5 flood-fighting action plans (1 per major watershed).
E2.2: Flood-Fighting Action Plans
West Little Llagas Creek Emergency Action Plan (EAP) and Uvas Creek EAP (Uvas/Llagas Watershed))
In September 2018, the District's Emerging Leaders Certification Program participants, with guidance and oversight from the Emergency Services & Security Unit, completed the development of flood response procedures, which included incorporating input from the cities of Morgan Hill (West Little Llagas Creek) and Gilroy (Uvas Creek).
San Francisquito Creek EAP (Lower Peninsula watershed)
This EAP was completed in FY17 and will be updated annually.on an ongoing basis. Staff had to postpone the current update on the internal San Francisquito EAP due to the work needed on the aforementioned creeks that did not yet have an EAP. This project will continue after the Joint EAP with the City of San José is exercised (tested) and completed in December 2018.
Canoas Creek EAP (Guadalupe watershed)
This EAP is now complete. It has been incorporated into the appendix within the Joint EAP with the City of San José. In addition, flood response procedures for Ross and Canoas creeks are also complete and now appendices to the Joint EAP with the city. These additions were approved by the District’s CEO and the City of San José’s general manager.
Updated January 2019
No current documents.
Key Performance Indicators for the Safe, Clean Water Program
Coordinate with agencies to incorporate District-endorsed flood emergency procedures into their Emergency Operations Center plans.
Complete 5 flood-fighting action plans (1 per major watershed).
Reduces flood damage
Provides effective coordinated response to storm-related emergencies
Improves community awareness about flood risks
Geographic Area of Benefit
About the Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program
In November 2012 the voters of Santa Clara County overwhelmingly approved Measure B, the Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program, as a countywide special parcel tax for 15 years with a sunset date of June 30, 2028. This Program replaced the Clean, Safe Creeks and Natural Flood Protection Plan, which voters approved in November 2000.
The Safe, Clean Water Program was developed with input from more than 16,000 residents and stakeholders and was created to match the community’s needs and values. The voters of Santa Clara County identified five priorities:
Priority A: Ensure a Safe, Reliable Water Supply
Priority B: Reduce Toxins, Hazards and Contaminants in our Waterways
Priority C: Protect our Water Supply from Earthquakes and Natural Disasters
Priority D: Restore Wildlife Habitat and Provide Open Space
Priority E: Provide Flood Protection to Homes, Businesses, Schools and Highways
Other: Six projects from the Clean, Safe, Creeks Plan have been carried forward into the Safe, Clean Water Program.
Each year, the District prepares a report providing a progress update for each of these Program priorities, along with fiscal year accomplishments.
To ensure transparency and accountability to the voters, the ballot measure also created an Independent Monitoring Committee, appointed by the Santa Clara Valley Water District Board of Directors. The Independent Monitoring Committee annually reviews the Program’s progress to ensure the outcomes are achieved in a cost-efficient manner and reports its findings to the Board.
In addition, the Program requires three independent audits, the first of which was conducted in FY 2017.